Parliamentary and presidential democracies: which one is best with the exception of the united states, where a system of separation of executive and legislative powers exists, all countries that are considered to be stable democracies adopt. Should india adopt one india one election- one issue of one nation-one election is in the headlines these days the modi government of the center wants the lok sabha and the assembly elections to be held all over the country. Best answer: the presidential form of government is fine, but the present system (parliamentary) isn't bad either in the parliamentary system, legislature is paramount, that is so because the executive is a part of legislature.
In his book why india needs the presidential system, author bhanu dhamija, himself a publisher, seeks to answer this question, while extending some radical thoughts on how we should be governed. Swaran singh committee appointed by the congress government in 1975 also considered in detail whether the parliamentary system should be continued or should be replaced by the presidential system the committee opined that there is no need to replace parliamentary system. Isha vyas said: (mar 21, 2017) : in my opinion, india should not jump on to presidential form because india has a wide number of population and to control so much population by only one person doesn't seem good and even may be because of this there would be many differences among people related to caste and religious system.
System and whether nepal should adopt a presidential system, continue with the parliamentary executive model, or explore a semi-presidential compromise the collapse of the constituent assembly in may 2012 created a crisis that was. The other system of democracy is presidential system which has been adopted and perfected by the usa in a presidential system the people elect the president by voting for the candidate directly( leaving aside the fact that in usa that the votes are not counted directly but indirectly through an electoral college . India should adopt presidential system essay sample a presidential system is a system of government[-0] where an executive branch[-1] is led by a person who serves as both head of state[-2] and head of government[-3.
India should adopt presidential system essay countries should adopt presidential system a presidential system is a system of government[-0] where an executive branch[-1] is led by a person who serves as both head of state[-2] and head of government[-3. Obama will likely not go down in history as a great president he failed to unite americans behind a bold and visionary new endeavour his deeds didn't quite match the lofty words that brought him. Those who support the presidential system should do their homework when they argue against the parliamentary system there is also the matter of separation of powers.
The coalition has pushed for the country to adopt a parliamentary system of government whose structure of executive would include an elected president and a deputy it also has an appointed prime. This is why i have repeatedly advocated a presidential system for india not just for the federal government in new delhi, but a system of directly elected chief executives at the levels of villages, towns, states and the centre, elected for fixed terms and accountable to the voters every five years, rather than to the caprices of legislatures. Highlights the congress alleged that the government is in the process of privatising india's heritage the contract with dalmia group was signed under the centre's 'adopt a heritage' scheme.
Executive power in india and sri lanka rehan abeyratne 779 should they adopt it adopted a presidential system modelled on the french. Based on an average of current national polls, jindal would not be among the 10 candidates to participate in the first presidential debate on fox news this august. The presidential system with its monocephalous executive is different here executive authority and leadership are vested in a single individual, the president, who is the chief executive.
A presidential system is a system of authorities where an executive subdivision is led by a individual who serves as both caput of province and caput of authorities. The constitution of india rejected the presidential system as in the usa on the grounds that under such a system, the executive and the legislatures are separate from and independent of each other, which is likely to cause conflicts between them, which our infant democracy could ill-afford to risk.
Therefore i think, we have to adopt the presidential system just like in the usa, ruling and opposing 2) secondly, in my opinion, a democratic system cannot survive if its foundation is having religious cracks and therefore there should not any concession based on any religious factor in the national and provincial governance. A presidential system centralises power in one individual unlike the parliamentary system, where the prime minister is the first among equals the surrender to the authority of one individual, as in the presidential system, is dangerous for democracy. Recently mp shashi tharoor commented on the need for india to adopt a presidential system of democracy in order to bring stability in the system he further urged indians to rekindle the debate on the kind of democracy we should have in india.